OSINT · Investigative journalism

OSINT for investigative journalism

OSINT for journalists doing investigative work: verify sources, check images and trace networks with an auditable methodology. Built for freelance journalists, investigative newsrooms and fact-checkers.

What OSINT solves in a newsroom

Three problems every investigative story drags along: doubting who is really on the other end, not knowing if an image is authentic, and not understanding the digital ecosystem around the subject.

🔍

Source verification

Check whether an email, phone number or profile belongs to who it claims to be before quoting it in a piece.

🖼️

Visual authenticity

Detect deepfakes, manipulation and image reuse. Recover EXIF and geolocate whenever possible.

🕸️

Network mapping

Locate related profiles, bot networks or coordinated accounts around an actor.

Who uses it

Built for professionals who need to investigate with methodology and leave a traceable record.

✍️

Freelance journalists

Independent investigation on a limited budget.

📰

Newsrooms

Investigative teams at established outlets.

Fact-checkers

Fast verification of hoaxes, images and statements.

🔬

Researchers

Independent analysis, NGOs and observatories.

The three tools a newsroom uses most

The ones that strike gold in an investigation. The rest of the catalog is there for specific cases.

⭐ Essential

Image analysis

The tool a newsroom needs most: verifying the authenticity of photos and videos before publishing.

  • Deepfake and manipulation detection
  • EXIF: camera, date and geolocation
  • Aggregated reverse image search
  • Forensic pixel analysis
See tool →
⭐ Essential

Social media analysis

To map account networks, identify bots and check an actor’s narrative against their real history.

  • Aggregated profile across platforms
  • Fake or coordinated account detection
  • Activity and context analysis
  • Immutable capture for custody
See tool →
⭐ Essential

Email analysis

To verify an anonymous source, detect disposable emails and check for presence in leaks.

  • Technical mailbox validity
  • Linked accounts across platforms
  • Presence in breaches and leaks
  • Domain context (corporate / disposable)
See tool →

Also available for specific cases: phone, domain and IP.

Three typical newsroom cases

Practical examples of how the tools combine during an investigation.

CASE 1

A viral photo — real or recycled?

You upload the image for analysis: check EXIF, detect if it’s a deepfake, run reverse image search. In seconds you know whether the photo belongs to the event it’s cited for or was reused.

CASE 2

An anonymous source wants to reach out

You verify their email: technical validity, presence on platforms you’d expect, historical breaches. Then you cross-check phone and social media. You decide whether their profile checks out before quoting them.

CASE 3

An account is amplifying a narrative

You investigate the social media profile: activity, coordination with other accounts, real account age. You detect whether it’s part of a bot network or shows legitimate human behavior.

🔜 Coming soon

IntelMind 360 — Automatic correlation engine for newsrooms

A correlation engine that cascades through people, companies, domains and leaks until it exhausts the gold in the story. Built for anyone investigating without a technical team on hand.

Still in development. Sign up and be among the first to try it.

No spam. We’ll only write to you when IntelMind 360 is available for testing.
We heard you! We’re actively building IntelMind 360. We’ll write to you as soon as it’s available — and in the meantime we’ve sent you an email confirming your signup.
That email doesn’t look valid. Please check it and try again.

Frequently asked questions

What newsroom teams ask most before trying it.

Can I use IntelMind as a freelance journalist with no newsroom budget?
Yes. There’s a free 14-day demo plan and a monthly Analista plan built for individual users. See plans and pricing.
Are the reports usable as evidence in litigation or a criminal complaint?
Reports are delivered as PDFs with a digital chain of custody (SHA-256 hash + RFC 3161 timestamp issued by FreeTSA + verification URL). That makes them defensible electronic evidence. Final admissibility rests with the judge, but the format is the expected technical standard.
Is it legal to investigate someone with your tools?
IntelMind operates exclusively with public sources (OSINT). Investigating a person using public data for a journalistic piece is protected by freedom of information when there’s genuine public interest. Editorial responsibility rests with the journalist; we provide the technical tools.
Will you index my searches or expose who I’m investigating?
No. Searches are private per user, never published or indexed. The investigated subject receives no notification.
How is this different from doing the searches by hand?
We aggregate dozens of sources in a single request, normalize the results, apply a reliability scoring system and deliver a PDF with custody. What takes hours by hand (or stays incomplete) takes minutes here, with full traceability.
Does it help verify fake news and viral hoaxes?
Yes, especially image analysis (deepfakes, reverse search, EXIF) and social media analysis (coordinated accounts, real profile age, context). These are the two typical entry points for fact-checking.

Start with a free analysis

Your first search doesn’t use up demo credits. Try it on a real case before deciding if it fits.

OSINT for journalists — source verification with legal traceability
Regulatory framework and official resources

About OSINT for journalists

These are the legal frameworks, institutions and authority references behind the professional use of OSINT for journalists with IntelMind: